Most businesses conduct their employee performance reviews annually. Typically, many managers do not enjoy conducting them and, to make matters worse, do not know the proper techniques for getting a review done properly.
Have the employee conduct a self-evaluation
Before sitting down for the actual review, have employees fill out a self-evaluation form. This gives employees an idea of what they are in store for during the actual reviews. Furthermore, it gets employees actively thinking about the work they have done in the past year. Additional benefits of self-evaluations include:
- Involving multiple perspectives in the eventual performance review. Managers cannot remember everything, and even if they can, they only bring their perspectives to the table.
- Alerting managers of any disparities between what they think an employee's performance has been and what the employee thinks.
- Showing employees that the review process is one of give-and-take. That is, the employee has a say in the process, too.
The mark of a good employee self-evaluation form is the quality of its questions. Here are some examples of general questions to include in a self-evaluation form:
- What work did you enjoy the most and why?
- What skills and talents helped you achieve success?
- What was the most difficult or challenging work you have done?
- What results make you the most proud?
Prepare for the review
Rushing through employee reviews to get them over and done with is one of the biggest mistakes managers make. If you want to make the review process move quickly and easily, take the time to prepare beforehand. Not only will this help expedite the actual review process, it will also make it less laborious.
To prepare for an employee performance review:
- Review the employee's job description.
- Write an agenda for the meeting.
- Think about what you want an employee to take from the review.
- Schedule reviews in advance; never spring them on an employee without notice.
- Review the performance measures you will use for assessment.
Implement a fair and consistent rating system
Quantifying performance review data can be a difficult process. Arbitrary numbers and grades do not tell you a whole lot -- what a "7" means to one person might be entirely different to someone else. The best approach to a rating system we have seen is the Unsatisfactory to Exceptional Scale:
- Unsatisfactory: The employee's work is well below the minimum level of performance. The employee must make significant improvements to the employee's work.
- Below Average: The employee's work meets some of the minimum levels of performance but not all. As a result, the employee must immediately improve in some aspect of his or her work.
- Satisfactory: The employee's work meets all minimum levels of performance, even excelling in some areas.
- Above Average: The employee's work is above minimum levels of performance. The employee shows initiative for and investment in the business' success.
- Exceptional: The employee's work exhibits superior levels of performance, and the employee's work has had a direct impact on the overall success of the company.
Furthermore, be sure to provide employees with a ratings key complete with short, 1-2 sentence descriptions of what each rating means, similar to our example above. This helps ensure that everyone is on the same page as far as what a rating means exactly.
After handing out employee self-evaluations, all that is left is to have the actual performance reviews. When the time comes, make sure you come prepared. What is the point of having an employee performance review if neither you nor your employees take anything away from it? As for the review itself, make sure your rating system is known throughout the organization and is fair, easy to understand and consistently used by each manager.
For more information about performance reviews, contact Carrie Cox via email, or Cindy McSwain using her information below.
Senior Vice President
Cindy McSwain leads AGH’s outsourcing services group. Her team provides payroll, accounting, funds disbursement, controller, and other financial outsourcing services to numerous clients throughout the U.S. Prior to directing the outsourcing group, Cindy served AGH’s audit clients for 10 years, working with a wide range of middle-market, closely held and family-owned clients.
Her current clients cross many industry sectors, including manufacturing, distribution, restaurants, retailers, medical, and not-for-profit. She has participated in numerous SEC filings and public registrations and has experience in mergers and acquisitions. Cindy is a certified public accountant and a member of both the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Kansas Society of Certified Public Accountants.
Copyright © Drip Marketing, Inc., www.dripmarketing.com. All Rights Reserved.